In a surprising display of market composure, crude oil prices have shown remarkable stability despite significant escalations in US-Iran relations. Recent US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and Iran's parliamentary vote to potentially close the Strait of Hormuz have failed to trigger the price volatility one might expect from such major geopolitical developments. This puzzling market response raises important questions about whether traders are accurately assessing risk or dangerously underestimating the potential for conflict.

Oil market’s resilience in the face of geopolitical storms

The oil market's muted reaction to recent events has left many analysts perplexed. Following US airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, Brent crude briefly touched $80 before quickly retreating. Similarly, WTI hovered near $76 momentarily before settling back down. This fleeting price movement stands in stark contrast to the severity of events unfolding in the region.

Iran's defiant response, including its parliament backing measures to potentially close the Strait of Hormuz, would historically have sent oil prices soaring. Yet markets have remained notably calm, suggesting traders are operating on a different set of assumptions than geopolitical analysts.

Decoding the collective oil market’s sentiment 

Markets function less as reactive headline readers and more as sophisticated probability calculators. Current pricing suggests traders are making several key assumptions:

First, there appears to be widespread scepticism that Iran will actually follow through on threats to close the Strait of Hormuz unless further provoked. Second, traders seem confident in American military deterrence preventing full-scale regional conflict. Third, healthy global oil inventories are providing a comfortable buffer against potential supply disruptions. Finally, market participants appear to be focused on short-term tactical positions rather than strategic long-term bets on geopolitical outcomes.

As one industry analyst observed, the market is essentially in "wait-and-see mode," requiring tangible evidence of supply disruption before pricing in significant risk premiums.

The Strait of Hormuz and oil

Understanding the Strait of Hormuz's significance helps contextualise what's at stake. This narrow waterway between Iran and Oman serves as the transit route for approximately 20% of global oil supplies and a substantial portion of natural gas exports. Any disruption to this crucial maritime passage would have immediate global repercussions.

While Iran's parliament has voted to close the strait, the ultimate decision rests with the country's Supreme National Security Council. Though Iran depends on this route for its own exports, national pride and strategic considerations could potentially outweigh economic self-interest, particularly under intense external pressure.

According to Goldman Sachs analysis, even a partial month-long disruption affecting half the oil flowing through Hormuz could send Brent crude prices spiking to $110, with natural gas markets experiencing similar upheaval. A prolonged disruption scenario could maintain elevated prices for an extended period.

Historical precedents of oil’s price volatility

The market's current composure reflects a growing pattern of desensitisation to Middle East conflicts. In 2019, drone attacks on Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq facility triggered a historic 20% single-day surge in Brent prices. Yet by early 2020, the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani—an event that raised serious concerns about regional retaliation—barely moved prices.

This suggests a troubling pattern: oil markets now require actual supply disruptions, not merely the threat of them, to trigger significant price movements. This numbness to risk could be dangerous. Events that would have prompted major price adjustments a decade ago now barely register in market movements.

The crucial question becomes whether today's market is displaying wisdom or dangerous complacency.

Leadership considerations and oil prices

Decision-makers across finance, energy, logistics and policy sectors would be unwise to interpret current oil prices as accurate reflections of geopolitical risk. Today's pricing may reflect trader optimism, inventory buffers or simple complacency rather than a comprehensive assessment of potential outcomes.

Prediction markets currently assign a 52% probability that Iran will attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz in 2025. Should this occur, the market reaction would likely be abrupt and severe rather than gradual.

China's role remains a critical factor, as it purchases over half of Iran's exported crude. Beijing therefore has both significant influence and substantial interest in maintaining open shipping lanes through Hormuz. American diplomatic efforts have reportedly included encouraging Chinese intervention, though these diplomatic channels provide no guarantees.

Technical analysis: Current movements and key oil price levels

At the time of writing, oil prices are dipping sharply from the highs seen over the weekend. Oil prices are dipping within a buy zone, hinting at a potential price reversal. If we see a reversal, prices could find resistance at the $76.85 level. Conversely, if we see a protracted slump, prices could find support at the $73.08, $66.55, and $60.00 price levels.

While oil markets currently seem dismissive of worst-case scenarios, prudent leadership cannot afford such luxury. The current market calm doesn't necessarily indicate reduced risk—it may simply reflect a collective bet on restraint from all parties involved. Should Iran retaliate significantly or move to disrupt maritime traffic through Hormuz, today's relatively stable price environment could quickly give way to extreme volatility.

‍